Built SDL2_image and _mixer static

libsdl2_image/external/tiff-4.0.9/libtiff-CVE-2017-11613.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+From 5c3bc1c78dfe05eb5f4224650ad606b75e1f7034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Even Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com>
+Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:14:01 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip: avoid memory exhaustion
+ (CVE-2017-11613)
+
+In ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip(), if the computed number of strips is big
+enough and we are in read only mode, validate that the file size is consistent
+with that number of strips to avoid useless attempts at allocating a lot of
+memory for the td_stripbytecount and td_stripoffset arrays.
+
+Rework fix done in 3719385a3fac5cfb20b487619a5f08abbf967cf8 to work in more
+cases like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=6979.
+Credit to OSS Fuzz
+
+Fixes http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2724
+---
+ libtiff/tif_dirread.c | 10 ++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/libtiff/tif_dirread.c b/libtiff/tif_dirread.c
+index 80aaf8d..5896a78 100644
+--- a/libtiff/tif_dirread.c
++++ b/libtiff/tif_dirread.c
+@@ -5760,6 +5760,16 @@ ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip(TIFF* tif)
+         if( nstrips == 0 )
+             return;
+ 
++        /* If we are going to allocate a lot of memory, make sure that the */
++        /* file is as big as needed */
++        if( tif->tif_mode == O_RDONLY &&
++            nstrips > 1000000 &&
++            (offset >= TIFFGetFileSize(tif) ||
++             stripbytes > (TIFFGetFileSize(tif) - offset) / (nstrips - 1)) )
++        {
++            return;
++        }
++
+ 	newcounts = (uint64*) _TIFFCheckMalloc(tif, nstrips, sizeof (uint64),
+ 				"for chopped \"StripByteCounts\" array");
+ 	newoffsets = (uint64*) _TIFFCheckMalloc(tif, nstrips, sizeof (uint64),
+-- 
+2.17.1
+